We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy with the information contained on this site, or perhaps the information linked to on the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can generate inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.

Some pluralist systems, such as Scots legislation in Scotland and types of civil law jurisdictions in Quebec and Louisiana, will not specifically fit into the dual common-civil legislation system classifications. These types of systems might have been intensely influenced through the Anglo-American common regulation tradition; however, their substantive legislation is firmly rooted in the civil legislation tradition.

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is often a free and democratic place, and once a person becomes a major they can marry whosoever he/she likes; If your parents with the boy or girl never approve of these types of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they are able to do if they can Slash off social relations with the son or even the daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Lady that is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or male who's a major, the couple is neither harassed by anybody nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who gives these threats or harasses or commits acts of violence both himself or at his instigation, is taken to endeavor by instituting criminal proceedings through the police against this kind of persons and further stern action is taken against such person(s) as provided by regulation.

The necessary analysis (called ratio decidendi), then constitutes a precedent binding on other courts; further analyses not strictly necessary to your determination on the current case are called obiter dicta, which constitute persuasive authority but are certainly not technically binding. By contrast, decisions in civil regulation jurisdictions are generally shorter, referring only to statutes.[four]

thirteen . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some duration, both parties have agreed for the disposal of the moment petition about the premise that the DIGP Malir will hear the petitioner together with private respondents and will get care of many of the facets of the case and ensure that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.

Whilst there is not any prohibition against referring to case law from a state other than the state in which the case is being listened to, it holds little sway. Still, if there isn't any precedent during the home state, relevant case legislation from another state may very well be deemed because of the court.

When the state court hearing the case reviews the legislation, he finds that, whilst it mentions large multi-tenant properties in certain context, it is actually actually rather vague about whether the ninety-working day provision applies to all landlords. The judge, based within the specific circumstances of Stacy’s case, decides that all landlords are held to the ninety-working day notice necessity, and rules in Stacy’s favor.

168 . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Subject: Appeal At times it is actually practical to get a Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation to help make an attempt to eliminate a case on merit and more importantly when after recording of evidence it's reached into a stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for advantage disposal when it has achieved this kind of stage. Read more

Some bodies are offered statutory powers to issue guidance with persuasive authority or similar statutory effect, such as the Highway here Code.

139 . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Relating the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 of the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice is just not served, the grievance petition might be dismissed. This is because service of your grievance notice is actually a mandatory necessity as well as a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The legislation needs that a grievance notice be served to the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. Should the employer fails to reply or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) if the organization is transprovincial.

In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative of your legislation laid down with the Supreme Court within the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. Consequently, the competent authority on the parent department from the petitioner along with the Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount of the petitioner and pay back the pension amount and other ancillary benefits on the petitioner to which He's entitled under the legislation within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority in the respondent is usually directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits of your petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more

Any court may perhaps seek out to distinguish the present case from that of the binding precedent, to succeed in a different conclusion. The validity of this kind of distinction may or may not be accepted on appeal of that judgment to your higher court.

8. For the reasons stated over, this court finds the petition for being without legal or factual foundation and therefore dismisses it. This court concurs with the respondents' position as contend within the comments, and their request is Hence acceded to. All pending applications, if any, will also be dismissed. Read more

The uncovered Tribunal shall decide the case on merits, without being influenced via the findings within the Impugned order, after recording of evidence on the respective parties. Read more